Misrepresentation
You were told the product would save money, increase value, solve a problem, be maintenance-free or deliver benefits that did not materialise.
If you financed an installation that was mis-sold, defective, incomplete or failed to deliver what was promised, the finance provider may be an important part of your complaint.
Where credit was arranged as part of the purchase, the finance relationship can create additional routes that need to be properly assessed alongside the underlying installation dispute.
You were told the product would save money, increase value, solve a problem, be maintenance-free or deliver benefits that did not materialise.
The installation is defective, unsuitable, damaged the property, caused leaks, damp, condensation or requires significant remedial work.
You have paid for inspections, removal, repairs, replacement materials or other work because the original installation failed.
The installer is dissolved, insolvent, in liquidation, no longer trading or simply fails to respond to requests to put matters right.
The credit was not adequately explained, affordability or circumstances were not properly considered, or the lender rejected your complaint without resolving the underlying issues.
A finance provider has issued a final response you disagree with, or has not dealt with the complaint satisfactorily and further escalation may need to be considered.
Financed home improvement disputes often involve several connected issues: the sale, the installation, representations made by the supplier, the finance agreement, subsequent damage and the cost of putting matters right.
The circumstances of each agreement are different, but these are common categories where homeowners may need help investigating a complaint.
Provide the basic details of the installation, installer, finance company and the problems experienced.
We assess what documents exist, what is missing and which evidence is likely to carry the most weight.
The relevant facts, representations, defects, losses and finance issues are organised into a structured case.
The complaint can be pursued with the finance provider and considered for further escalation where appropriate.
Depending on the facts and the type of credit, consumer credit and contract protections may be relevant to how a complaint is assessed.
In qualifying debtor-creditor-supplier arrangements, a credit provider can in certain circumstances be jointly responsible for a supplier's breach of contract or misrepresentation.
In appropriate cases, issues concerning whether the relationship arising from a credit agreement is unfair may also require consideration.
The quality of the service, information provided before the sale, contractual promises and misleading statements may all be relevant to the underlying dispute.
The applicability of any legislation depends on the individual facts and agreement. References above are general information and are not legal advice.
It does not matter if the installer has stopped trading or if you have already complained. Send us the basic details and we can assess what information should be reviewed next.
Email: [email protected]